What does that mean, really? I hear all of these candidates and Washington suits blabbering about how they are going to work to reduce our dependence on foreign oil. I agree that Americans use a ton of fossil fuels. A lot more per day than almost any other country, but I don’t think people are going to just up and quit driving because gas is getting expensive. They have to go to work, pick up their kids, go shopping, and all that jazz.
CNN has an article with a bunch of mumbo jumbo from all kinds of politicians and candidates.
I’m sure that tons of corporations have fought for the lobbying spot in Washington that pushes our elected representatives around and convinces them what they need to be voting for. There’s going to be a lot of craziness in the coming years in regards to reducing our intake of foreign oil and the way it affects our economy.
I say that while we are waiting on auto-manufacturers to kick up their MPG ratings, we pass legislation that will add a tax on top of the price of any newly purchased car that gets less than 35MPG. For trucks it would be something like 25MPG, and so on, depending on the vehicle class. I think it would convince auto manufacturers to either change out the engines in their less efficient vehicles with engines that live up to the normal requirements, or to just cease production of the least efficient models.
When buying a car, theres two things I look at: The highway MPG and the MSRP of the car. The MPG could be considered one of the most important aspects that should be factored into the cost of ownership. For example, if you get a cheap car that gets only something like 22MPG, you could be wasting a lot of money when you get another car that is only around two thousand dollars more but with 37MPG, something that will keep saving you money as long as you own the car. The MPG serves as the variable cost of ownership, since the price of gas changes, while the cost of the car itself doesn’t change.
Think about it.
July 20th, 2007 - 12:56 pm
I was reading the article “Have we reached the energy tipping point?” and read the comment “It’s not that Americans don’t want to be environmentally friendly, it’s just that we don’t have much of a choice,” he wrote. “As an SUV driver, telling me that my only alternative is a Toyota Prius or a Honda Civic is like telling me to eat beef jerky when I’m used to filet mignon.”
Car manufacturers give us all kinds of choices! You can buy a luxury vehicle that has more room, is quieter, safer, and gets better gas mileage than an SUV. Yet, the majority of U.S. citizens choose vehicles that are heavy with features that they do not use. Example: A VW Passat Wagon has more interior and cargo room than the VW Touareg. It can be equiped with equal luxury amenities and all wheel drive. The Passat gets 26 mpg with AWD and the Touareg 18 mpg. The Touareg is built to tow 7800 lbs and do extreme off roading (like Moab). The VW Passat handles better in snow and can get through more than a foot of snow. Yet over 90% of the U.S. chooses the Touareg over the Passat Wagon. Why? I believe it is a fad. I had a woman buy a Suburu Forrester over the Passat Wagon because the Suburu called their station wagon an SUV. What? About the same ground clearance and a better 4wd system on the Passat. Here are some great choices to save fuel and get more luxury and more room than your SUV:
Mini Van (Chrysler Town and Counry, Honda Touring)
Station Wagon (Mercedes E-Class, Audi A-4 Avant)
Cross Over Vehicle (Lexus RX330, Nissan Murano)
don’t get 4wd or AWD unless you go offroad or experience snow on the roads more than 30 days out of the year.